Blog

  • Wimbledon 2026: Schedule, bracket, results: Jannik Sinner, Novak Djokovic, Aryna Sabalenka cruise in Round 2

    The second round of the men’s draw largely went according to plan, as all of the top 10 seeds who were in action rolled through their matches on Wednesday. No. 1 seed Jannik Sinner looked much improved in a solid win over Nuno Borges (7-6, 7-6, 6-4), while No. 3 seed Felix Auger-Aliassime, No. 7 seed Novak Djokovic, No. 8 seed Daniil Medvedev and No. 9 seed Flavio Cobolli all cruised in three or four sets.

    Unfortunately for American tennis fans, the top seed to go down in the men’s draw on Wednesday was No. 16 seed Learner Tien, who struggled with cramping in his match with veteran Marton Fucsovics and lost in four sets (6-7, 6-4, 7-6, 6-3). While Tien got dumped out, a number of other Americans punched their ticket to the third round as No. 21 seed Tommy Paul, Jenson Brooksby and Michael Zheng all picked up wins on Wednesday.

    The women’s draw saw the biggest upset of the day, as No. 5 seed and the 2026 French Open champion Mirra Andreeva got taken out by Barbora Krejcikova (4-6, 7-5, 6-4) in a stunner on Centre Court. No. 7 seed Coco Gauff nearly made it two top 10 seeds getting eliminated on Wednesday, but Gauff fought back from 7-4 down in a third-set tiebreak to escape with a win over Solana Sierra (6-3, 3-6, 7-6).

    The rest of the top women’s seeds took care of business in less dramatic fashion. No. 1 seed Aryna Sabalenka fought off a game effort from American McCartney Kessler (6-1, 7-6), while No. 4 seed Jessica Pegula, No. 10 seed Karolina Muchova, No. 11 seed Belinda Bencic, No. 14 seed Naomi Osaka and No. 16 seed Iva Jovic all rolled in straight sets.

    Wimbledon 2026 predictions, odds, picks: More chaos coming after wild run in France?
    Brent Brookhouse
    Wimbledon 2026 predictions, odds, picks: More chaos coming after wild run in France?

    Keep it locked here over the next two weeks for our complete coverage of the 2026 Wimbledon Championships.

    Where to watch the 2026 Wimbledon Championships

    • Dates: June 29 – July 12, 2026
    • Location: All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club — London
    • TV: ESPN, ABC | Stream: fubo (try for free)

    Notable Gentlemen’s singles matches on Wednesday

    1. Jannik Sinner def. Nuno Borges — (7-6, 7-6, 6-4)
    3. Felix Auger Aliassime def. Dino Prizmic — (7-6, 6-3, 7-5)
    7. Novak Djokovic def. Stefanos Tsitsipas — (6-3, 6-4, 6-2)
    8. Daniil Medvedev def. Daniel Merida Aguilar — (3-6, 6-3, 7-5, 6-2)
    Marton Fucsovics def. 16. Learner Tien — (6-7, 6-4, 7-6, 6-3)
    21. Tommy Paul def. Kwon Soon-woo — (6-3, 7-6, 6-2)
    22. Alejandro Davidovic Fokina def. Fabian Marozsán — (6-3, 6-0, 6-3)
    23. Rafael Jodar vs. Pablo Carreno Busta — (3-6, 6-3, 1-6, 2-1 suspended)
    24. Joao Fonseca def. Jesper De Jong — (6-1, 7-5, 6-4)
    25. Arthur Rinderknech def. Martin Damm Jr. — (6-4, 7-6, 7-5)
    28. Brandon Nakashima vs. Jan-Lennard Struff — (6-4, 6-7, 6-7, 7-6, suspended)
    Jenson Brooksby def. 31. Ignacio Buse — (6-2, 6-2, 6-3)

    Notable Ladies’ singles matches on Wednesday

    1. Aryna Sabalenka def. McCartney Kessler — (6-1, 7-6)
    4. Jessica Pegula def. Sara Sorribes — (7-6, 6-1)
    Barbora Krejcikova def. 5. Mirra Andreeva — (4-6, 7-5, 6-4)
    7. Coco Gauff def. Solana Sierra — (6-3, 3-6, 7-6)
    10. Karolina Muchova def. Zhang Shuai — (6-3, 6-2)
    No. 11 Belinda Bencic def. Wang Xinyu — (7-5, 6-0)
    14. Naomi Osaka def. Anastasia Gasanova — (6-3, 6-2)
    16. Iva Jovic def. Tatjana Maria — (6-1, 6-2)
    18. Ekaterina Alexandrova def. Lanlana Taraudee — (7-5, 7-5)
    19. Anna Kalinskaya def. Diane Parry — (6-4, 3-6, 7-6)
    Nikola Bartunkova def. 32. Katerina Siniakova — (6-2, 6-4)

  • Jaylen Brown trade grades: 76ers get ‘A+’ for landing Celtics star as Boston makes baffling decision

    brown-getty-2.png

    Getty Images

    The Boston Celtics are trading Jaylen Brown to the Philadelphia 76ers in exchange for Paul George, two first-round picks (2028 and 2031) and two second-round picks (2028 and 2030), according to ESPN. The 2028 first-rounder could convert from a first to a pick swap that is more favorable to the Celtics, while the 2031 pick is unprotected.

    The stunning deal marks the end of Brown’s enormously successful 10-season run in Boston. The No. 3 overall pick in the 2016 NBA Draft made five All-Star teams with the Celtics. He averaged at least 20 points for seven consecutive seasons, took the Celtics to the Eastern Conference Finals six times, the NBA Finals twice, and won Finals MVP as Boston won its 18th NBA championship in 2024. Now, he will continue his career in a rival city alongside a core of Joel EmbiidTyrese Maxey and VJ Edgecombe.

    Brown played alongside Jayson Tatum since Boston drafted the latter in 2017, but rumors about the Celtics splitting up the pair were common for much of their run together. The Celtics were linked to superstars like Anthony Davis and Kevin Durant over the years, but never pulled the trigger on a trade for Brown during his joint ascent with Tatum. The Celtics were rewarded for that faith with the 2024 title, but things slowly broke down from there.

    Tatum tore his Achilles during Boston’s title defense in 2025, and he missed most of the 2025-26 season. With Tatum sidelined, Brown had the best statistical season of his career in leading the Celtics to 56 wins, but Boston blew a 3-1 lead and lost Game 7 of its first-round series against the 76ers with Tatum out. That series exposed holes in Boston’s roster that would be hard to address with both Tatum and Brown earning supermax salaries in this enormously restrictive CBA environment.

    Brown responded by venting on Twitch after the Celtics were eliminated, claiming the NBA had an agenda against him. Perhaps just as notably, he called this season his “favorite year” of his basketball career rather than the 2024 title season. The Celtics, meanwhile, spent most of June negotiating a trade of Brown to the Milwaukee Bucks for Giannis Antetokounmpo. When Antetokounmpo was ultimately dealt to the Miami Heat, Boston elected to move on from Brown anyway, sending him to Philadelphia in a shocker.

    For much of the past two years, Philadelphia’s destiny was tied to two aging and injury-prone players. George has played just 78 regular-season games over two seasons with the 76ers, and he is entering his age-36 season. Coupled with the frequent absences of Embiid, Philadelphia appeared to be stuck with two supermax contracts that were aging badly.

    But George, following a 25-game suspension, returned to finish out the season strong. He averaged an efficient 17.4 points per game in the playoff series win over the Celtics, and now, he’s headed to Boston to serve as their Brown replacement. With Brown only 29 years old, the 76ers have improved at the forward spot with a player six years younger than the one that they sent out.

    Now, if Embiid can only stay healthy, the 76ers have a real path to genuine championship contention in a crowded Eastern Conference. Let’s grade the trade.

    Philadelphia 76ers: A+

    Landing Brown while moving off George’s contract? An outright steal

    When I ranked the worst contracts in the NBA in March, George, making supermax money ($54.1 million) for the next two seasons, ranked No. 5. At the time, that was a fairly common sentiment. He was out at that point due to a 25-game PED suspension, but even before that, he was inefficiently averaging a pretty modest 16.2 points per game and had far less defensive impact than at his peak. A good player, but a severely overpaid one whose 36th birthday was looming. The assumption was that Philadelphia would have to attach draft capital to move off of his contract.

    What changed after that? He returned from that suspension and played 10 nearly star-level regular-season games. He was fantastic in the playoffs, making nearly half of his 3-pointers and turning back the defensive clock against the Celtics. Essentially, in 21 games, George went from immovable to the only player involved in a trade for Brown. For a brief, fleeting moment, another team considered George to be a positive-value asset, or at least not so overwhelmingly negative that he would impede a trade like this. Was it just shooting variance? Did the 25-game rest revive him? It just seems hard to imagine that a 36-year-old could turn the clock back like that in any sort of permanent way.

    Brown is coming off a Second-Team All-NBA season. There is a credible reason to believe that the season was fool’s gold. Brown shot just under 51% on mid-range shots and just under 71% on restricted area shots from October through December. That’s around the point at which some people tried to nudge him into an MVP conversation he really never should have been a part of. After Jan. 1, he fell back down to earth, falling to around 41% on mid-range jumpers and 69% in the restricted area. He is not, in fact, a Kevin Durant-level individual scorer. But the 76ers did not pay a Durant-level price.

    player headshot
    Jaylen Brown

    BOS • SF • #7
    PPG28.7
    APG5.1
    SPG1.01
    3P/G1.972

    View Profile

    Any concerns about analytics, about unsustainable shooting, lackadaisical off-ball defense or years of on-off data suggesting the Celtics were just fine without Brown, fly out the window at this price. Two first-round picks. Two good first-round picks, to be fair, especially the 2028 pick that will reportedly be the better of the 76ers’ or the Los Angeles Clippers’ selections. But two picks nonetheless. That’s all it took for Philadelphia to turn an inferior, 36-year-old small forward into a superior one going into his age-30 season.

    So Brown isn’t really a Second-Team All-NBA player. Who cares? He won’t need to be in Philadelphia. For all of these years, we’ve talked about the possibility of Brown getting traded so he could lead his own team. On the 76ers, there will be nights in which he’s the leading scorer and there will be nights in which he finishes fourth. To get a reliable, in-his-prime All-Star for two picks and what we’ve been treating as one of the NBA’s worst contracts is an outright steal. Brown has never missed more than 19 games in a season. George has missed more time in six of the past seven.

    That youth and durability change a lot for Philadelphia. With Brown, Maxey and Edgecombe, the 76ers have so much shot creation that they can afford to be as cautious as humanly possible with Embiid. The name of the game, as we saw in the Boston series, is getting him into the playoffs healthy and then through the playoffs in one piece. He swung the series that we can now say broke up the Celtics. His workload has never been lighter than it is now.

    Brown is eligible to extend with Philadelphia. Even if he tacks on the maximum two years, his deal will still expire after his age-34 season. George’s tenure in Philadelphia began in his age-34 season. That’s how substantial the age gap here is. Brown should remain a productive player for a long time, but even as he starts to slip, the younger Edgecombe is in place to grow into a bigger role. Edgecombe, who turns 21 this month, won’t be paid market value for three more years, and Embiid’s contract expires at that point. Philadelphia should be able to keep this group together at least that long, and potentially longer.

    There are definite questions on the roster. The signing of Dean Wade addressed on-ball defense, and Brown will to some extent as well, but they’re still lacking on that end of the floor. The mere fact of paying Brown, Embiid and Maxey the max makes paying role players nearly impossible. The sixth-highest paid 76ers player right now is No. 22 overall pick Labaron Philon. They still have work to do.

    But we can’t overthink this one. Two first-round picks should not be able to turn a bad contract into an All-NBA six years his junior. No matter what concerns you might have about Brown, he is a substantial upgrade on George. This is among the biggest trade no-brainers in recent history.

    Boston Celtics: D-

    A baffling move for Boston on multiple levels

    Unless you’re treating George as a genuinely positive trade asset, Walker Kessler got traded for more than Brown on Wednesday. The Utah Jazz, at least, managed to extract two first-round swaps from the Los Angeles Lakers. The Celtics couldn’t even do that much with the 76ers.

    It’s not even clear that they got Philadelphia’s best available draft pick. That 2028 selection headed to Boston, reportedly the more favorable of the 76ers and Clippers, is great on paper. That’s especially true in the lottery reform era, where any pick has a chance to wildly outperform expectations. But the 2028 NBA Draft is regarded as relatively weak at this point. There’s a reason so many teams trading big-name players this offseason are targeting picks deep in the 2030s. Not only are the next few drafts considered underwhelming, but the new lottery reform rules expire after 2029, so there’s value in the uncertainty that will follow. Boston got one such pick in 2031. It did not get Philadelphia’s 2033 selection, arguably the best of the bunch for an executive with the sort of job security Brad Stevens has.

    player headshot
    Paul George

    PHI • SF • #8
    PPG17.3
    APG3.6
    SPG1.68
    3P/G2.703

    View Profile

    The theory of trading Brown in the first place, unless there was unresolvable tension behind the scenes, seemingly related to his contract. Both he and Tatum are making supermax money. Having two players make 35% of the salary cap every year puts an almost impossible strain on your depth. When the Celtics pursued Antetokounmpo, part of the idea was that a 35% max salary was justifiable for an MVP candidate who provided the exact rim-pressuring skills their team was lacking. George is not an MVP candidate. He does not have the exact skill set the Celtics were lacking. He is also making supermax money, just on a contract that is one year shorter.

    Brown’s value can’t have fallen that far, could it? And if so, were there not better offers out there? The Cleveland Cavaliers are trying to convince LeBron James to return for a minimum salary right now. Cleveland could’ve offered similar draft compensation, but with Jarrett Allen attached to solve Boston’s center problem. Reports have suggested that neither the Houston Rockets nor Charlotte Hornets, both coached by former members of Boston’s staff, were interested in Brown. They are both so asset-rich that either could have topped this price without really disturbing their long-term plans.

    Is there a follow-up move that makes this make sense? The Celtics still have a $27.7 million trade exception, but after signing Mitchell Robinson, they don’t have the first-apron hard cap flexibility they’ll need to take advantage of it without moving off more salary. Two first-round picks are valuable trade chips, but the Celtics still control most of their own picks moving forward. If they’re planning to shoot for, say, Trey Murphy III, you’d figure they already had the draft capital to get him. Maybe they’re planning to spend their own picks elsewhere and just didn’t want to leave themselves completely bankrupt in terms of remaining draft capital? Maybe the situation behind closed doors was just bad enough that they had to take what they could get? We may never know.

    But on paper, the easiest comparison here is the disastrous Luka Dončić trade the Dallas Mavericks made in 2025. The Celtics traded the better and younger player for an older, worse one, with minimal draft capital attached. Brown is not as valuable as Dončić, but the same six-year age gap applies. The Celtics did not get meaningfully cheaper in the deal. They didn’t even steal a Max Christie-esque role player.

    Every fiber of my being wants to give this trade an “F.” It is, by all reasonable logic, an “F” trade. But the Celtics have been so undeniably competent for so many years that I have to believe there is more to this trade than we currently appreciate. We’re talking about a team that won a championship with Brown two summers ago. They’ve made six Eastern Conference Finals since drafting Brown and won 56 games with him leading the team a season ago.

    Whether there were interpersonal dynamics we don’t understand, the market was truly this barren, or if there’s another move coming that makes a bit more sense of the situation, the Celtics have earned just enough benefit of the doubt to believe there’s a better explanation for this trade than we see in this moment.

    But on paper, this is a catastrophe.

    The Celtics got older and worse without getting meaningfully cheaper or overwhelmingly richer in draft capital. A Brown trade made sense if it was going to net Antetokounmpo or a picks-and-depth bonanza. But at this price point, it’s just hard to justify giving Brown away rather than simply keeping him.

  • How the USMNT refused to blink against Bosnia and Herzegovina and kept World Cup dreams alive

    pochettino-2.jpg

    Getty Images

    SANTA CLARA, Calif. – At the World Cup, the U.S. men’s national team have become accustomed to an early lead and a game state that suits their fluid, attack-minded tendencies. Describing the goals they scored in Wednesday’s 2-0 win over Bosnia and Herzegovina in the round of 32 as inevitable would be a bridge too far, but it was well within their skillset, so much so that Folarin Balogun’s game-opening goal in the 45th minute felt like a long time coming. They had seemingly survived their opponents’ disruptive game plan just before the break, the group halfway to their first win in the World Cup knockouts in 24 years, the floodgates perhaps open in time for the second half.

    Soccer, though, had other plans.

    For starters, the flurry of shots they hoped to take against Bosnia and Herzegovina never came. The game resumed its slog-like nature as soon as the referee blew the whistle for the second half, their very first shot after the break only coming in the 79th minute. It was far from their biggest problem, though – star striker Balogun was shown a red card in the 64th minute for a studs-up challenge on Tarik Muharemovic, even if it was completely unintentional because he had his back to the defender. Conventional wisdom would suggest that the USMNT attempt to bunker down to protect a narrow one-goal lead with a half hour on the clock, their attempts not coming off no matter how hard they tried. That was especially true on the wings, through which the USMNT’s attack usually flows; Sergino Dest and Christian Pulisic drifted too wide and were not particularly present, with Balogun off the pitch, the balance was off.

    The USMNT, though, stuck to their guns and stayed true to a mode that had defined their World Cup journey but has never actually been the team’s trademark — they played like big shots.

    Soccer’s great tactical existential question has naturally carried over to a World Cup played after practical, rigid play took over certain subsections of the global game. The USMNT, and many other teams along with them at this World Cup, have decided that the best defense is as competent an offense one can possibly muster. It was never easy for the USMNT against Bosnia and Herzegovina, who limited them to just two shots on target and 0.92 expected goals. It did not deter the USMNT, who were rewarded for their persistence with a goal from Malik Tillman nearly 20 minutes after Balogun’s red card — and with only their shot of the second half.

    It was an ambitious strategy that reflected the aims of a team intent on making a statement run at a World Cup on home soil, the momentum of a hard-fought but solution-oriented victory aligning accordingly. It is also a signal that, against many odds, the USMNT are positioning themselves as a team that really can attempt to place themselves amongst the world’s best, many of them stylishly ambitious in their own right.

    Their round of 16 game against Belgium on Monday will offer a uniquely stiff test of their ability to live up to their own aspirations. Their next opponent has not always impressed at this World Cup but can rest on their top talents, chief among them midfielder Kevin de Bruyne, the greatest playmaker of his generation.

    A win in the round of 32 still feels like some version of purgatory between the group stage and the knockouts, even if the round has overall been entertaining. This win, though, is just as valuable as the rest and marks an important step in the journey — and a particularly memorable one, too.

     

     

  • FIFA World Cup Scores

    FT
    T
    soccer team logoEngland
    2
    soccer team logoDR Congo
    1
    Round of 32, Mercedes-Benz Stadium
    FT
    T
    soccer team logoBelgium
    3
    soccer team logoSenegal
    2
    Round of 32, Lumen Field
    FT
    T
    soccer team logoUnited States
    2
    soccer team logoBosnia-Herz.
    0
    Round of 32, Levi’s Stadium
  • MLB Scores

    FINAL
    R H E
    1 4 0
    Orioles40-48
    6 7 0
    Oriole Park at Camden Yards, Baltimore, MD
    • W: D. Kremer  (1-1)
    • L: N. Schultz  (2-5)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    D. Kremer BAL P6.0 IP, 4 H, 1 ER, 4 SO, 1 BB
    player headshot
    L. Taveras BAL RF1-3, 2 R, 1 HR, 1 RBI
    FINAL
    R H E
    Rangers44-43
    4 8 0
    9 11 0
    Progressive Field, Cleveland, OH
    • W: J. Cantillo  (7-3)
    • L: M. Gore  (5-7)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    J. Cantillo CLE P5.0 IP, 3 H, 2 ER, 4 SO, 5 BB
    player headshot
    A. Hedges CLE C1-3, 2 R, 1 HR, 3 RBI
    FINAL
    R H E
    Tigers38-49
    6 6 0
    Yankees48-38
    2 7 2
    Yankee Stadium, Bronx, NY
    • W: K. Montero  (5-5)
    • L: C. Doval  (3-1)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    T. Melton DET P6.1 IP, 2 H, 7 SO, 1 BB
    player headshot
    K. Montero DET P2.0 IP, 3 SO, 1 BB
    FINAL
    R H E
    10 13 0
    Red Sox37-48
    2 9 0
    Fenway Park, Boston, MA
    • W: A. Alvarez  (2-1)
    • L: P. Tolle  (4-6)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    A. Alvarez WAS P4.2 IP, 2 H, 6 SO, 1 BB
    player headshot
    J. Wood WAS LF2-4, 2 R, 1 HR, 3 RBI
    FINAL
    R H E
    Padres43-42
    3 11 1
    Cubs49-38
    23 17 0
    Wrigley Field, Chicago, IL
    • W: C. Rea  (6-5)
    • L: W. Buehler  (5-4)
    • S: J. Wicks  (2)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    D. Swanson CHC SS3-5, 4 R, 3 HR, 8 RBI
    player headshot
    M. Conforto CHC RF3-4, 4 R, 2 HR, 4 RBI
    FINAL
    R H E
    Mets36-51
    3 5 0
    9 12 0
    Rogers Centre, Toronto, ON
    • W: S. Miles  (4-1)
    • L: F. Peralta  (5-7)
    • S: P. Corbin  (1)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    P. Corbin TOR P5.0 IP, 4 H, 3 ER, 5 SO
    player headshot
    S. Miles TOR P3.0 IP, 1 H, 5 SO, 1 BB
    FINAL
    R H E
    Pirates43-44
    6 12 1
    10 11 0
    Citizens Bank Park, Philadelphia, PA
    • W: O. Kerkering  (6-0)
    • L: P. Skenes  (6-8)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    O. Kerkering PHI P1.2 IP
    player headshot
    T. Turner PHI SS2-5, 2 R, 1 HR, 3 RBI
    FINAL
    R H E
    1 2 2
    Braves50-34
    5 6 0
    Truist Park, Atlanta, GA
    • W: R. Lopez  (4-1)
    • L: M. McGreevy  (3-7)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    R. Lopez ATL P5.0 IP, 2 H, 1 ER, 6 SO, 1 BB
    player headshot
    M. McGreevy STL P6.0 IP, 3 H, 2 ER, 3 SO, 1 BB
    FINAL
    R H E
    Rays50-33
    4 11 2
    Royals35-52
    0 6 0
    Kauffman Stadium, Kansas City, MO
    • W: S. McClanahan  (7-5)
    • L: S. Lugo  (3-6)
    • S: K. Kelly  (4)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    S. McClanahan TB P6.0 IP, 3 H, 4 SO
    player headshot
    K. Kelly TB P1.1 IP, 1 H
    FINAL
    R H E
    Reds39-46
    2 8 2
    Brewers53-31
    4 8 0
    American Family Field, Milwaukee, WI
    • W: A. Ashby  (12-1)
    • L: B. Burke  (3-4)
    • S: T. Megill  (12)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    A. Ashby MIL P1.1 IP, 1 H, 2 SO
    player headshot
    G. Mitchell MIL CF4-4, 1 R, 1 RBI
    FINAL
    R H E
    Twins42-46
    8 8 2
    Astros43-46
    3 8 0
    Daikin Park, Houston, TX
    • W: T. Bradley  (7-3)
    • L: T. Imai  (5-4)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    T. Bradley MIN P5.0 IP, 4 H, 1 ER, 11 SO, 3 BB
    player headshot
    L. Keaschall MIN RF1-2, 3 R, 1 HR, 1 RBI
    FINAL
    R H E
    Marlins46-41
    3 7 1
    Rockies34-53
    6 7 0
    Coors Field, Denver, CO
    • W: K. Freeland  (2-7)
    • L: M. Meyer  (9-1)
    • S: B. Bernardino  (1)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    K. Freeland COL P5.0 IP, 6 H, 2 ER, 7 SO, 1 BB
    player headshot
    M. Moniak COL DH3-4, 2 R, 1 HR, 3 RBI
    FINAL
    R H E
    Dodgers56-31
    1 5 0
    7 12 0
    Sutter Health Park, West Sacramento, California
    • W: J. Ginn  (7-4)
    • L: C. Barnes  (0-1)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    J. Ginn ATH P6.0 IP, 3 H, 1 ER, 4 SO, 5 BB
    player headshot
    J. Heim ATH C2-3, 2 R, 1 HR, 2 RBI
    FINAL
    R H E
    Giants36-50
    6 11 2
    4 7 1
    Chase Field, Phoenix, AZ
    • W: T. McDonald  (3-6)
    • L: Z. Gallen  (3-8)
    • S: C. Kilian  (7)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    player headshot
    T. McDonald SF P6.0 IP, 1 H, 5 SO
    player headshot
    H. Ramos SF RF2-4, 2 R, 1 HR, 2 RBI
  • Trevor McDonald allows 1 hit over 6 scoreless innings as Giants finally beat Diamondbacks, 6-4

    PHOENIX (AP) Trevor McDonald pitched six scoreless innings, Victor Bericoto hit a two-run homer and the San Francisco Giants beat the Arizona Diamondbacks 6-4 on Wednesday night.

    Heliot Ramos had a solo homer and an RBI triple to help the Giants snap an eight-game skid against Arizona. San Francisco avoided being swept by the Diamondbacks for the third time this year and its first 0-9 start to a season against a single opponent in franchise history.

    McDonald (3-6) allowed one hit – a leadoff single by Ketel Marte in the fourth – and struck out five without a walk. The 25-year-old right-hander was 0-6 with a 6.47 ERA in his previous seven starts.

    Caleb Kilian pitched a 1-2-3 ninth with two strikeouts for his seventh save.

    Ramos, Bericoto, Jung Hoo Lee and Drew Cavanaugh had two hits apiece.

    Ramos hit the first pitch in the fifth 427 feet over the wall in center field. Lee followed with a single and, two pitches later, Bericoto added a 422-foot shot that made it 3-0.

    Rafael Devers walked with two outs in the sixth and Ramos tripled off the top of the wall in center before Lee and Cavanaugh added run-scoring singles that gave the Giants a 6-0 lead.

    Arizona starter Zac Gallen (3-8) gave up six runs and seven hits in 5 2/3 innings.

    Marte had two hits, including an RBI double, and two stolen bases. Pavin Smith and Corbin Carroll each added an RBI in a four-run eighth.

    The Giants begin a series Friday at Colorado.

    The Diamondbacks host a three-game series against Milwaukee that begins Friday.

    AP MLB: https://apnews.com/hub/MLB

    Copyright 2026 STATS LLC and Associated Press. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS LLC and Associated Press is strictly prohibited.

    Expert Picks
    Betting Picks for Every Game
    • Picks from Vegas experts and insiders
    • Optimal rankings, props, DFS strategy
    • Spread, OU, ML picks from 10k simulations
    Larry Hartstein
    Larry HartsteinThe Maestro
    +146 (63%)
    Last 8 MLB Game Props
    Arizona-120
    Arizona • First 5 Innings Moneyline • Game Prop
    Picked Jul 1 @ 8:27 pm, 1 unit on BetMGM
    LOSS
    Zac Gallen has been horrible lately but one of his best starts came at home against these Giants. On May 18, he tossed six innings and allowed two runs in a 12-2 win over San Francisco. That’s part of Arizona’s 8-0 record vs. the Giants this season. While it’s hard to back Gallen, I have a lot more faith in the Diamondbacks lineup against Trevor McDonald. The rookie posted a 5.73 ERA in June and San Fran has dropped six of his last seven starts.

    Larry’s Pick

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E

    36-50

    0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 6 11 2
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 7 1
    • W: T. McDonald (3-6)L: Z. Gallen (3-8)S: C. Kilian (7)
    • HR: SF – H. Ramos (6), V. Bericoto (4)
    PLAYERS OF THE GAME
    HITTERS AB R H RBI AVG
    L. Arraez 2B 5 0 0 0 .326
    C. Schmitt 3B 5 0 0 0 .278
    B. Eldridge DH 5 0 1 0 .275
    R. Devers 1B 3 1 1 0 .242
    H. Ramos RF 4 2 2 2 .268
    J. Cox CF 0 0 0 0 .280
    J. Lee CF-RF 4 2 2 1 .319
    V. Bericoto LF 4 1 2 2 .308
    D. Gilbert LF 0 0 0 0 .228
    D. Cavanaugh C 4 0 2 1 .286
    C. Koss SS 4 0 1 0 .111
    HITTERS AB R H RBI AVG
    K. Marte 2B 4 1 2 1 .267
    G. Perdomo SS 4 0 1 0 .244
    C. Carroll RF 4 0 0 1 .269
    G. Moreno DH 3 0 1 0 .283
    L. Gurriel LF 4 0 0 0 .220
    A. Del Castillo C 4 0 0 0 .182
    N. Arenado 3B 4 1 1 0 .243
    P. Smith 1B 4 1 1 1 .152
    T. Troy CF 3 1 1 0 .235
    BATTING
    • 3B – H. Ramos (2)
    • HR – H. Ramos (6), V. Bericoto (4)
    • RBI – H. Ramos 2 (23), J. Lee (32), V. Bericoto 2 (6), D. Cavanaugh (2)
    • 2-Out RBI – H. Ramos, J. Lee, D. Cavanaugh
    • Runners left in scoring position, 2-Out – H. Ramos, C. Koss
    BATTING
    • 2B – K. Marte (18)
    • RBI – K. Marte (54), C. Carroll (44), P. Smith (6)
    • Runners left in scoring position, 2-Out – G. Moreno, L. Gurriel, A. Del Castillo
    BASERUNNING
    • SB – J. Lee (6)
    BASERUNNING
    • SB – K. Marte 2 (3)
    FIELDING
    • E – C. Koss 2 (2)
    FIELDING
    • DP – (Marte-Perdomo-Smith)
    • E – G. Perdomo (5)
    PITCHERS IP H ER BB SO ERA
    T. McDonald(W, 3-6) 6.0 1 0 0 5 4.42
    E. Miller 1.0 1 0 1 2 4.03
    R. Walker 0.0 4 4 0 0 7.06
    D. Smith(H, 2) 1.0 1 0 0 1 1.86
    C. Kilian(S, 7) 1.0 0 0 0 2 4.00
    PITCHERS IP H ER BB SO ERA
    Z. Gallen(L, 3-8) 5.2 7 6 1 4 6.36
    R. Thompson 0.1 2 0 0 0 2.76
    J. Loaisiga 1.0 2 0 0 1 2.56
    T. Clarke 1.0 0 0 0 0 2.17
    B. Garcia 1.0 0 0 0 1 2.33
    PITCHING
    • Pitches-Strikes – T. McDonald 90-53, E. Miller 20-11, R. Walker 12-7, D. Smith 13-9, C. Kilian 10-7
    • Ground Balls-Fly Balls – T. McDonald 7-4, E. Miller 2-0, R. Walker 1-0, D. Smith 1-0, C. Kilian 1-0
    • Batters Faced – T. McDonald 19, E. Miller 5, R. Walker 4, D. Smith 4, C. Kilian 3
    PITCHING
    • Pitches-Strikes – Z. Gallen 95-65, R. Thompson 9-7, J. Loaisiga 16-12, T. Clarke 21-13, B. Garcia 16-12
    • Ground Balls-Fly Balls – Z. Gallen 10-5, R. Thompson 3-0, J. Loaisiga 3-1, T. Clarke 1-0, B. Garcia 1-1
    • Batters Faced – Z. Gallen 24, R. Thompson 3, J. Loaisiga 5, T. Clarke 3, B. Garcia 4
  • Suns recap and news

     

    • Suns’ Luke Kennard: Signs with Phoenix

      Kennard signed a two-year, $13 million contract with the Suns on Tuesday, Shams Charania of ESPN reports.

      After playing for three teams in the past two seasons, Kennard will join the Suns and figures to play a meaningful role off the bench. The veteran sharpshooter appeared in 78 regular-season games (six starts) between the Hawks and Lakers in 2025-26, averaging 8.4 points, 2.3 rebounds, 2.2 assists and 0.7 steals in 21.6 minutes per game. He also led the league in three-point percentage, shooting 47.8 percent from beyond the arc.

    • Suns’ Jamaree Bouyea: Team option being exercised

      The Suns will exercise the $2.58 million team option on Bouyea‘s contract for the 2026-27 season, per Michael Scotto of USA Today.

      Phoenix reinforces its backcourt depth behind Devin Booker and Jalen Green with the move. Bouyea averaged 5.7 points, 1.8 rebounds and 1.8 assists in 14.0 minutes per contest through 46 games during the regular season.

    • Suns’ Miles Bridges: Headed to Phoenix

      The Hornets traded Bridges, a 2029 first-round pick and a 2027 second-round pick to the Suns on Sunday in exchange for Grayson Allen, Royce O’Neale and a 2033 first-round pick, Shams Charania of ESPN reports.

      Bridges should continue to start in Phoenix, but his usage will likely dip, as he’ll be competing for touches with the likes of Devin Booker, Jalen Green and Dillon Brooks. Bridges supplied averages of 17.1 points, 5.8 rebounds, 3.2 assists and 1.9 triples per game this past season with the Hornets, but his offensive role might shrink some with the Suns.

    • Suns’ Corey Camper: Lands Exhibit 10 contract

      Camper signed an Exhibit 10 contract with the Suns on Thursday, Chris Murray of Nevada Sports Net reports.

      Camper didn’t hear his name called during the 2026 NBA Draft but will have a chance to leave a positive impression with the Suns during Summer League. Over 33 appearances (32 starts) for Nevada in 2025-26, he averaged 16.6 points, 4.8 rebounds, 2.7 assists and 1.2 steals in 32.2 minutes per tilt.

    • Suns’ Mark Williams: Plans to sign three-year deal

      Williams (foot) plans to sign a three-year, $38 million contract to remain with the Suns, Shams Charania of ESPN reports.

      Williams averaged a double-double in his final season in Charlotte. While his production dropped in his first year with the Suns in 2025-26, he still averaged 11.7 points, 8.0 rebounds, 1.0 assists, 0.9 blocks and 0.9 steals across 23.6 minutes. Without question, the 24-year-old is a talented player, though injuries have kept him off the floor more often than not. It’s unknown if Williams will remain the Suns’ starting center in 2026-27. However, even though Oso Ighodaro, Khaman Maluach and Rasheer Fleming have shown flashes of promise, they still aren’t as skilled as Williams when healthy.

    Team Statistical Rankings

    PTS/G OPP PTS/G
    Team 112.6
    (26th)
    111.1
    (6th)

    Injuries

    PLAYER INJURY
    Mark Williams C Foot
    Jordan Goodwin SG Calf

     

  • Kawhi Leonard trade grades: Clippers get ‘A+’ for franchise-altering pivot as Raptors take major risk

    kawhi-getty-2.png

    Getty Images

    The Los Angeles Clippers are trading Kawhi Leonard back to the Toronto Raptors, according to ESPN. The deal sends Leonard to the team with whom he won the 2019 championship and Finals MVP. That summer, he left Toronto to sign a free-agent deal with the Clippers. Now, seven years later, the Raptors are bringing the most talented player in franchise history back to Canada in one of the biggest trades of the offseason.

    The return package for the Clippers includes Brandon IngramGradey Dick, unprotected first-round picks in 2031 and 2033, a pick swap in 2027 and two second-rounders (2030 and 2033), per ESPN.

    The Leonard era in Los Angeles included some of the highest highs in franchise history, but ultimately ended in disappointment. After trading Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and a historic package of draft picks to the Oklahoma City Thunder for Paul George in order to secure Leonard’s commitment, the Clippers only reached one Western Conference Finals with Leonard on the team. That was the first conference finals appearance in team history, but Leonard missed that series after tearing his ACL in the prior round against the Utah Jazz.

    Meanwhile, the NBA is investigating whether the Clippers circumvented the salary cap through a sponsorship agreement between Leonard and Aspiration to direct more money to Leonard. That investigation has been ongoing since last offseason. The Clippers have maintained their innocence since the allegations, brought to light by reporter Pablo Torre, came to light.

    LeBron James landing spots: Four teams that make sense as The King leaves the Lakers
    Robby Kalland
    LeBron James landing spots: Four teams that make sense as The King leaves the Lakers

    After years of injuries, Leonard has bounced back over the past two seasons to return to All-NBA form. Yet as the Clippers traded James Harden and Ivica Zubac at the deadline to launch a youth movement, a Leonard deal eventually seemed inevitable. However, with Leonard on an expiring contract, he had control over his possible destinations. After all, the whole league saw him leave Toronto the first time despite winning a championship. In fact, Leonard was reportedly only interested in signing an extension with his two former teams: the Raptors and the San Antonio Spurs.

    Toronto has rebuilt its team entirely since Leonard last played there. No players from the 2019 championship team remain on the roster, and both top executive Masai Ujiri and coach Nick Nurse are gone as well. But current Raptors general manager Bobby Webster was part of the front office that built those 2019 champions, and last year, he put together a roster that had a surprisingly successful season.

    The Raptors won 46 games, earning the No. 5 seed in the Eastern Conference behind a breakout season from Scottie Barnes, who made his second All-Star appearance. Despite playing the first round of the playoffs with several significant injuries, the Raptors managed to push the Cleveland Cavaliers to seven games in a near-upset. With Barnes ascending to true stardom, the Raptors decided to push to get back into genuine Eastern Conference contention. So let’s grade this trade for both sides:

    Toronto Raptors: C+

    Toronto adds star to pair with Scottie Barnes — but at a significant risk and cost

    When the Raptors traded for Ingram at the 2025 trade deadline, they seemingly did so knowing that Scottie Barnes is an incredible all-around player whose biggest shortcoming would be clutch scoring. Ingram was supposed to be their late-game shot maker, and for most of last season, he was.

    But he was overmatched in the playoffs before he got hurt. Even without him and Immanuel Quickley, Barnes thrived. He pushed the Cavaliers to seven games in the first round while functioning as the point guard. That series showed Toronto that Barnes is ready for a higher level of contention. He just needed the right co-star.

    The Raptors wanted a half-court shot maker. Leonard is an apex half-court shot maker. There will be a bit of positional overlap since Barnes last season started taking more of the mid-range shots that Leonard prefers. But that’s a solvable problem considering how well Leonard can shoot from deep. Leonard needed to play with a younger star who could keep him fresh across the 82-game grind. Barnes needed to play with an end-of-game killer who could carry his team across the finish line in the closing minutes. In that respect, they both got exactly what they needed. The Raptors generated the fourth-most fast-break points in the NBA last season. If they maintain their turnover generation and willingness to run while adding Leonard’s half-court brilliance, their offense has a chance to be very, very good.

    Leonard is not the same level of 48-minute defender that he was when he won Defensive Player of the Year, or even when he was last a Raptor. But, again, he won’t need to be. Toronto has great defenders everywhere. The trio of Barnes, Leonard and Collin Murray-Boyles is among the best defensive frontcourts any team can put on the floor this season. Jamal Shead is tiny, but a ferocious point-of-attack defender. Ja’Kobe Walter falls between Shead and the big wings: not quite imposing enough for the strongest forwards and centers, but a headache for most guards he encounters.

    Toronto should be among the very best defenses in the NBA. The Raptors ranked fifth last season, and that was with Ingram in Leonard’s place and Murray-Boyles still finding his footing as a rookie. Now they are not only loaded with talent, but also with versatility. They genuinely have enough wing defense and size to switch every screen if they want.

    You could make a compelling case that the Raptors are now the Eastern Conference’s second-best team. The Boston Celtics are in a state of flux with Jaylen Brown on the trade block. In the Eastern Conference Finals, the Cavaliers got absolutely waxed by the New York Knicks — as did almost everyone else. We’ll see how Tyrese Haliburton looks as he returns to the Indiana Pacers following his torn Achilles. The Miami Heat are trying to build around Giannis Antetokounmpo with minimal resources. The Detroit Pistons are still looking for a secondary scorer.

    On paper, the Raptors probably have the most balanced roster of any of them. They pose a far more severe threat to New York than anyone in the East did last year… if they can stay healthy.

    Raptors taking major risk at hefty price

    The immediate questions here are medical. Toronto, led by the highly regarded vice president of player health and performance, Alex McKechnie, did an excellent job of keeping Leonard healthy during the 2018-19 season. He’s much older now, and the Raptors just made a significant investment in him moving forward. Leonard is eligible for a contract extension, and reports have indicated that Toronto was the only team he was willing to sign with. A big extension could go poorly, given Leonard’s age and history of injuries. It’s hard to imagine the NBA allowing this trade to go through if the results of its investigation into Aspiration could affect Leonard’s status with the Raptors, but it is worth noting that the investigation is still technically ongoing in the background here. We don’t know what its findings could mean for Leonard.

    Now we have to address the compensation. In a vacuum, two first-round picks and a swap are a reasonable price for someone as accomplished as Leonard. What matters here is which first-round picks Toronto gave up: a 2027 first-round swap that’s non-trivial considering the swap rights the Clippers owe to the Thunder… and unprotected picks in 2031 and 2033.

    In the NBA right now, there are effectively two classes of first-round picks. There are picks covered by lottery reform that come between 2027 and 2029, and then there are picks slated to convey after that. In the simplest terms, we do not know what the lottery rules will be in 2030 and beyondThe lottery reform the NBA recently adopted lasts only through 2029. The rules could change in ways that could be enormously advantageous for these picks. Miami is the only other team to trade multiple picks in the 2030s this offseason, but did so for a 31-year-old Antetokounmpo.

    Leonard is four years older and has a more extensive injury history. It is at the very least improbable that he remains in Toronto when these unprotected picks eventually convey, and if he’s still there, he’ll be a different player. Now, Barnes, 24, and Murray-Boyles, 21, are young. If they’re still in place, the Raptors should remain competitive. But the NBA is a cruel and random league, and no team can just assume it’s going to be great five and seven years down the line.

    Perhaps more importantly, giving up these picks now costs Toronto the liquidity it might need to build a team around Barnes and Murray-Boyles later. Even if Leonard is great for a few years, who is going to be the scoring star the Raptors pursue when he ages out of his own stardom? Lacking those 2030s picks will make it harder for Toronto to find that player if it needs to.

    Had these picks been in the 2020s, I would have given the Raptors a “B” or a “B+.” They made their team significantly better and potentially entered the championship picture by making this deal. You don’t compete for championships without taking some risks. There’s one trophy at the end of the season and 29 teams don’t win it. The Knicks just won theirs, in part, by giving up far more to get a far worse player in Mikal Bridges. Whether it was Leonard or someone else, the Raptors were going to take this risk on someone.

    But given all the risk factors associated with Leonard, whether or not Toronto should have pulled the trigger here is probably a toss-up. It doesn’t have the sort of downside risk that, say, the Phoenix Suns took on when they traded all of their picks for Kevin Durant. But there’s no such thing as guaranteed success with trades. The risk here was enormous… but the reward potentially could be as well.

    Even if the Raptors aren’t quite at the level that, say, the Thunder or the Spurs are, they weren’t at the level the Golden State Warriors were in 2019 either. All it takes is one injury, one lucky break, and if you put yourself in a position to take advantage, you can break through and win a title. I think the Raptors are there now. They once again have a puncher’s chance at the trophy that only Leonard has ever been able to get them.

    Los Angeles Clippers: A+

    Clippers execute brilliant pivot, ship out Leonard at peak of his value

    A move like this became inevitable the moment the Clippers traded for Harden, and perhaps as far back as their initial acquisition of Leonard. The Clippers thankfully just completed their obligation to the Thunder from the Paul George trade… but now still owe three years’ worth of pick control to Oklahoma City and the Philadelphia 76ers for the Harden acquisition. They have been operating at a substantial asset disadvantage for years now. As Leonard aged, it became clear that the championship window he once opened was closed.

    From a medical standpoint, Leonard is something of a time bomb. He appeared in just 266 of a possible 472 games in his first six seasons with the Clippers. Had Los Angeles tried to move him after last season, the value return likely would have been minimal. But Leonard just played 65 games at an All-NBA level. Considering he just turned 35, the odds of him remaining that available next season and beyond are not great. Leonard’s trade value was never going to be higher than it was this offseason, and with no championship upside in keeping him, the Clippers had little choice but to act. Since the Raptors were the only team Leonard was known to be willing to extend with, the Clippers didn’t have much leverage to drum up any sort of bidding war.

    Under that context, getting the specific picks they got is frankly astounding. This is a potential franchise-altering move for the Clippers, who are suddenly in a pretty enviable long-term position. Let’s start with that 2027 swap. Before this trade, the Clippers were essentially guaranteed to pick at the bottom of the first round. Not only do the Thunder have the right to swap with them, but Oklahoma City can force them to take Denver’s pick instead of their own. Now, the Clippers buy into some Toronto downside risk in case Leonard gets hurt, and the Thunder can’t access this pick.

    Why 2031, 2033 unprotected picks are so valuable

    The picks in the 2030s are the potential game-changers here. They are among the most valuable outstanding draft assets in the NBA, and the job the Clippers have done in pivoting off of a doomed era over the past six months has been an outright front office masterclass. In January, they had a near-the-end Harden, a near-the-end Leonard and an in-his-prime Zubac who quietly was not playing quite as well as he had in his breakout 2024-25 campaign.

    They turned those three players into an All-Star point guard a decade younger than their old one in Darius GarlandBennedict Mathurin, who they could still re-sign in restricted free agency, the No. 5 overall pick in this year’s NBA Draft (Keaton Wagler), three valuable future first-round picks (2029 from Indiana and 2031 and 2033 from Toronto) and that quietly interesting 2027 swap. This should be the blueprint for how middle-of-the-standings front offices with older rosters try to pivot. Once they wait out the pick control they still owe from the original Harden trade a few years back, they’ll be among the more asset-rich teams in the NBA.

    So what is the plan with this newfound flexibility? I would imagine it’s something like the one they put in place after Chris Paul left in 2018 to join the Houston Rockets. The Clippers re-signed Blake Griffin that offseason only to flip him for more assets. They preserved cap flexibility moving forward — as they are positioned to do now — with the idea that at some point in the near future, there would be another disgruntled star or two who wanted to come play in Los Angeles. That’s ultimately what happened, and they secured Leonard and George.

    In the interim, the idea will be to develop their young players and remain competitive enough to attract future stars. That’s a pretty attainable goal. Ingram is flawed and disappointed for Toronto in the playoffs, but he also made the Eastern Conference All-Star Team last year at the NBA’s scarcest position. He can at least slide into Leonard’s small forward slot and give the Clippers some offense. Dick was a former lottery pick. It never quite clicked in Toronto, but maybe the Clippers can get him back on track. The Clippers have the flexibility to add talent this offseason. Garland was terrific after his arrival from Cleveland. The Clippers managed to win 48 games without Paul or Griffin in 2019.

    This is a very competent organization with a great coaching staff. They are not going to be pushovers if Garland can just stay on the court.

    It’s going to take the Clippers a few years to re-enter the championship picture, but if they do so, it will be because of the trades they’ve made over the past six months. They turned one of the bleakest outlooks in the entire NBA into a near blank canvas with plenty of youth and future draft capital to work with.

    The Leonard era may not have been as successful as they hoped, but they can now move forward with the hope of one day building something better.

     

     

    Raptors Nearing Deal to Acquire Kawhi Leonard(0:43)
    • Kawhi Leonard trade grades: Clippers get ‘A+’ for masterful pivot

  • FIFA World Cup Scores

    FT
    T
    soccer team logoIvory Coast
    1
    soccer team logoNorway
    2
    Round of 32, AT&T Stadium
    FT
    T
    soccer team logoFrance
    3
    soccer team logoSweden
    0
    Round of 32, MetLife Stadium
    FT
    T
    soccer team logoMexico
    2
    soccer team logoEcuador
    0
    Round of 32, Estadio Azteca
  • MLB Scores

    FINAL
    R H E
    9 11 0
    Orioles39-48
    3 9 0
    Oriole Park at Camden Yards, Baltimore, MD
    • W: E. Fedde  (3-6)
    • L: T. Gibson  (1-3)
    • S: T. Schweitzer  (1)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Pirates43-43
    0 5 0
    8 12 0
    Citizens Bank Park, Philadelphia, PA
    • W: C. Sanchez  (10-3)
    • L: B. Chandler  (3-8)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Rangers44-42
    4 6 0
    2 5 1
    Progressive Field, Cleveland, OH
    • W: J. deGrom  (7-5)
    • L: T. Bibee  (2-9)
    • S: J. Latz  (18)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Tigers37-49
    9 11 1
    Yankees48-37
    3 4 1
    Yankee Stadium, Bronx, NY
    • W: T. Skubal  (4-4)
    • L: C. Schlittler  (8-5)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Mets36-50
    3 7 0
    0 6 1
    Rogers Centre, Toronto, ON
    • W: N. McLean  (5-5)
    • L: K. Gausman  (4-7)
    • S: D. Williams  (12)
    FINAL
    R H E
    8 12 1
    Red Sox37-47
    1 4 0
    Fenway Park, Boston, MA
    • W: C. Cavalli  (5-4)
    • L: G. Weissert  (0-2)
    FINAL
    R H E
    5 6 0
    Braves49-34
    3 6 0
    Truist Park, Atlanta, GA
    • W: M. Liberatore  (4-5)
    • L: M. Perez  (6-5)
    • S: R. O’Brien  (21)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Reds39-45
    2 6 0
    Brewers52-31
    7 14 0
    American Family Field, Milwaukee, WI
    • W: B. Sproat  (3-4)
    • L: R. Lowder  (3-6)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Rays49-33
    10 11 0
    Royals35-51
    4 6 1
    Kauffman Stadium, Kansas City, MO
    • W: G. Jax  (4-5)
    • L: N. Cameron  (4-6)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Padres43-41
    7 13 1
    Cubs48-38
    9 13 0
    Wrigley Field, Chicago, IL
    • W: M. Boyd  (3-1)
    • L: J. Sears  (1-1)
    • S: R. Rolison  (1)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Twins41-46
    4 6 0
    Astros43-45
    6 8 1
    Daikin Park, Houston, TX
    • W: M. Burrows  (4-8)
    • L: J. Ryan  (5-5)
    • S: J. Hader  (8)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Marlins46-40
    14 21 0
    Rockies33-53
    3 5 2
    Coors Field, Denver, CO
    • W: E. Perez  (4-6)
    • L: T. Gordon  (0-2)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Angels36-51
    3 6 0
    8 13 1
    T-Mobile Park, Seattle, WA
    • W: B. Woo  (7-6)
    • L: J. Soriano  (8-5)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Dodgers56-30
    9 14 0
    3 7 1
    Sutter Health Park, West Sacramento, California
    • W: J. Wrobleski  (10-2)
    • L: J. Springs  (3-8)
    FINAL
    R H E
    Giants35-50
    2 4 0
    8 10 0
    Chase Field, Phoenix, AZ
    • W: B. Pfaadt  (1-1)
    • L: L. Roupp  (5-8)